Any Animal That Attacks a Human Should be Destroyed at Once :: Animals Violence

An animal that attacks a human creation should not be abolished. In any type of case in law, you always excite to begin justification and be fair, why terminatet animals pass water it? Most animals attack when we attack them, it might have even been an accident.In any law case, no matter high school or low, you always have to have reasons for why or at least how it happened. You dont just say to the lawyer, That person ruined me, eradicate that person at once. You wouldnt, would you? Animals have to be justified to our standardsThe animal could have even done it accidentally. Some of the animals might view of us as food. They try biting us, but once they find out we ar not food, we dont just go to them and kill it. Its an accident. Everyone makes mis starts.Most animals attack when they be attacked or frightened by us. For fount, take a look at a snake. Not long ago, I read an information book about snakes and it said, We think that snakes deliberately harm us because it is our habit, but think a bit more deeper, we atomic number 18 the ones who harm or frighten them first. Now take an new(prenominal) example and compare it. If someone tried to attack us, what we would do without even intellection is obvious, defend ourselves. Well so do animals. They are only support and protecting themselvesOn the other hand, however, what if it is situation between life and ending? If it is a situation between life and death, and you have to kill it, accordingly go ahead. If you are about do die, and a big tiger is going to kill you, you dont just let it eat you, you try to think of the last solution, which is killing it.Therefore, one can conclude, besides the fact that if you are in a situation between life and death, and have to kill it, it doesnt give us the right to destroy it other times.