Has globalisation made the world more or less secure Discuss with Essay

Has globalization make the world more or less secure Discuss with specific reference to the rise of non-State actors - demonstrate ExampleAn indicative example is the cold war period, during which the term security measures was related to state and security as integrated units. In the after-cold war period, which was characterized by the gradual development of globalisation, the term security refers mostly to environmental and health problems internal conflicts be also issues related to security in the era of globalisation. flowing paper focuses on the issue whether globalisation has do the world more or less secure. deferred payment is also made to the non-state actors, which have been given increased powers regarding the internal issues of states. This phenomenon has been related to globalisation, which has increased its involvement in the activities of states and individuals worldwide. It is proved that the part of globalisation in security worldwide has been negative howe ver, the specific problem could be effectively resolved with the cooperation of states. In order for any such effort to be successful, it is required that measures are substantial in advance for controlling the expansion of non-state actors, as circumstanceors influencing the political and social framework of countries worldwide. 2. globalisation and security in the international community. The role of non-State actors 2.1 Globalisation and security In the context of globalisation it has been made quite difficult for security worldwide to be appropriately promoted. The reason is that globalisation supports practices and ideas, which are oftentimes in opposition with the national culture and rules. In this context, the conflict between the non-state actors and the intra state practices (Al-Rodhan 2006, p.162) is increased. The preceding(prenominal) fact has a negative influence on the efforts of international bodies to promote the world peace and health. Indeed, many of the plans developed by the UN for securing the health and safety of people in countries worldwide are led to a failure. The role of globalisation in the demarcation of the security of states is analysed in the study of Till et al. (2009). In accordance with the above researchers, globalisation has led states to cede a number of their security functions to non-state factors (Till et al. 2009, p.47). The above target has been achieved through the next method under the fear of globalisation certain states avoid their participation in critical commercialized activities worldwide however, in this way, their economic power is reduced, a fact that leads, also, to the worsening of their position, as members of the international community. beneath these terms, states become weak towards military threats in case of such threats they would need the support of non-state factors. In this way, the limitation of sovereignty, a fear that initially led the country to its economic exclusion, becomes a cle ar threat. The power of globalisation to promote instability is not limited to the external environment, referring to the relationship between a state and the otherwise countries of the international community. It mountain also refer to the states internal environment, where the promotion of economic disparities (Till et al. 2009, p.47) can lead to severe conflicts. Trying to explain the increased power of globalisation over national issues, including security, Fagan et al. (2009) referred to the weakness of the old-fashioned instrumental politics