Does it make sense to say that a fetus has a right to life Explain the Essay

Does it make sense to say that a foetus has a right to life Explain the general beliefs about the nature of rights which underp - try ExampleThis is an interesting debate since it brings out the most intriguing debates on abortion and its legality. This paper will bring out the philosophical contrasts that surround the tactile sensation of life and juxtapose them to each other in an attempt to reach a conclusion. It will be an effort when one can claim that fetus acquires the right to life in the process for pregnancy and that there is no outright black or white answer to the question of whether fetus has a right to life. To begin with, the central issue in this question is the position of the fetus. There are in total three different philosophical suit for this debate the liberal, the conservatives, and the moderates. Let the paper begin with the liberalists argument on the topic. Mary Ann Warren, a famous liberalist on this notion, analyses the concept of personhood. Her cla im is that if one assumes fetus to be a person, then it justly proves its right to life but then the whole question boils down to the definition of personhood. Therefore, Warren suggests a five-point postulate, which is concur upon by pro-life and pro-abortion alike (Baumgardner, 15). First, a person is conscious of objects and events, which exist externally and internally with respect to his being particularly, the ability to sense pain. Second, a person can exercise reasoning, which means that one has a capacity to solve complex problems. Third, a person can carry on activities on indigence derived by his own self. Fourth, a person has an ability to communicate and lastly, a person is the one who possesses self-concept and self-awareness. Using this as a criterion, warren argues that despite the circumstance that the fetus will eventually grow up to be a person fulfilling all these standards, it does not, in its present status possesses any moral status and thus a right to life. However, one cannot ignore that this definition of personhood and demolishing fetus from being considered a person legally provides just grounds for infanticide. Thus, the argument of personhood becomes illogical and irrelevant until a divine rationale is introduced. Hence, this definition of personhood denies the potentiality and eccentricity of the fetus. Now the paper turns to conservatives. These people argue that a fetus has a moral status since the day of conception. John Noonan, a pro-life activist defies the argument of stages of development of fetus. He contends that these stages do not exist in real and that the tender development takes place with continuity. He notes that whether the fetus is a result of rape or not planned or is a sufferer of any defect, these exceptions should not be exempted from the rule. The only way this school of thought permits abortion is when the embryo poses danger to the life of mother. Between these polar and raging extremes lies the moderat e school of thought. Jane English, a famous proponent of this view suspects the concept of personhood explained by Warren and takes into consideration both the views and gives her decision in favor of what US Supreme Court decided a in the case of Roe vs. Wade in 1973 (Romaine, 105). Her basic