Risks of youth internet use

Risks of youth internet useMURPHY 1The internet and various social networking sites, specifically, cede seen a surge in activity from teenages and young adults in the past few years. Individuals, ages ten years old to thirty years old, argon the primary(prenominal) users of these social networking sites. These same individuals either view or post themselves involved in some kind of challenge game for the amusement of themselves or others. sight see these games as fun and entertaining to watch however, some of these games ar very dangerous. Many of these individuals experience peer drive at the hands of their friends and family to do these challenges. To determine how peer shove and challenge games affect these people, we must define peer pressure, look at those who are the most predisposed, look at the phylogeny of these challenge games, and how these games can let detrimental effects on those who consume in themPeer pressure, or peer influence, is the persistent and persu asive verbiage or tactics used by a group of individuals k this instantn as a peer group to hike other individuals to change their values, beliefs, or actions in exchange for acceptance into said peer group. According to Calv-Armengol and Jackson, there are two types of peer pressure. One is positivist and the other is prejudicious. In the case of positive pressure, the pressure exerted by one agent reduces the cost that other agents face for taking a particular action, thus encouraging other agents to take the action. Essentially, this is similar subsidizing other agents activity. In the case of negative pressure, the pressure exerted by one agent increases other agents costs of not taking an action. That is, one way to encourage an agent to take an action is to make it much costly for him or her not to take the action. Calv-Armengol and Jackson states that positive and negative peer pressure have more nuanced differences and similarities. They also suggest looking at the inte ntions rather than the actions of the person. However, for the scope of this paper, we will look at the basic definition of negative peer pressure where one agent makes it costly for another agent to not take action.When considering those who are the most susceptible to peer pressure, some(prenominal) areas surface such as the persons age, gender, socioeconomic status, and the atmosphere at the persons home. Rihtaric and Kamenov places these factors into four different categories, adolescents openness to influence, salience of peers who exert pressure, adolescents ability or opportunity to perform, and relationship dynamics.Openness is chiefly a personality trait that determines a persons willingness to try spic-and-span things and have new experiences. Being open to influences is not inherently a bad thing however, if left unmonitored or improperly monitored, the adolescent could experience negative effects in their personalities and their actions. The adolescent being open to in fluence could result in them being urged and encouraged to act in ways that they would not normally act. Adolescents with low will power will often conform and fall victim to peer pressure.According to Berk, due to school, jobs, and other factors, adolescents spend less metre with soused family members and more time with their peers. Adolescents often seek intimacy or psychological closeness, loyalty, mutual understandings, beliefs, and feelings from their peers. The peer group, then, strengthens with each criterion that the person meets. With the internet now being no more than a hands reach, make up ones minding friends on social networking sites often supplement actual friends. In some cases, to adolescents, these internet relationships are the closest adolescents have to actual friends. In other cases, these cyber friends are just as important as real friends are. Berk states that it is because of this closeness and the need to be close that increases the susceptibility in ma ny adolescents for facing degrading racial and ethnic slurs, potentially harmful social experiences, sexually obscene remarks, and even peer pressure. To find the group that is the most susceptible, you must look at the individuals attachment style. There are two different forms of attachment, take into custody and dangerous. Those with a secure attachment style seem to have peer relationships that are low in peer pressure. This may be due to the more positive choices and influences that soulfulness with a secure attachment has. The results of several studies favor the assumption that susceptibility to peer pressure concerning misconduct could be higher among adolescents with insecure attachment. (Calv-Armengol Jackson, 2010) Susceptibility increases with the insecure attachment anxious type. For both males and females, susceptibility increases if they have anxiety about their relationships and the groups perception of them if they do not go along with the crowd. question has a lso shown that insecure attachment to peers or parents correlated with high alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, and drug abuse among adolescents. For males, there seems to be more openness to engage in misconduct than their female counterparts. There is an even higher chance to engage in misconduct if the males friends ask them to do so. Females are susceptible to peer pressure but not to the extent of males. Essentially, adolescents are the group that is most susceptible to deviant behavior and misconduct because of peer pressure and peer influence. This influence seems to be greater in males than in females. It is even greater if males or females experience anxiety about their social standing in their peer group. gainsay games are tasks where a person or groups of people perform some feat, often of stupidity, for the amusement of themselves and others. The ALS trash Bucket Challenge is one of the more recent challenge games that brings awareness to Amyotrophic Lateral Scleros is, also known as ALS or Lou Gehrigs disease, which is a debilitating progressive and degenerative neuromuscular disease. In this challenge, people were to record themselves dumping a bucket filled with ice water over themselves and nominating three other friends for the challenge or donating money to the ALS foundation. This fad spread like wildfire and almost every social media outlet filled with ALS Ice Bucket Challenge videos plain overnight. People posted these videos so that everybody could see exactly who has to do the challenge next. Those called out might not have had any money to donate or they did not want to be drenched in icy cold water. Those who received the challenge experienced peer pressure to donate or effusive water over their head. The pressure to perform came from them not wanting to seem insensitive to the goal of the ALS ice bucket challenge. Since this challenge was for charity, there was more of a receptive nature having multiple news outlets, athletic tea ms, schools, musicians, actors, and everybody in between performing the challenge.The ALS Ice Bucket Challenge is a blameless game however, there are others with a higher chance to cause serious harm. There was the cinnamon challenge where the participant must hold a large amount of cinnamon in their mouths for a certain amount of time. Some people reported respiratory problems because of this game. Another game that many a pressured into is the knockout game. This was showcased in the media because children, most often adolescent males from low socioeconomic statuses and broken homes, in essence stalked a person, waited until it was clear, then ran up stool the person they were stalking and punched them as hard as they could. This often ended in multiple adolescents, predominantly male, going to detainment centers or jail.There are several more games of the likes of the Ice Bucket Challenge, Cinnamon Challenge, and the Knockout Challenge. All of the games vary in degree and sever ity. It could be as innocent as the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge or as severe as the Knockout Challenge. The common thread in all challenge games is the idea that to be a part of the collective, you must conform or do whatever they ask of you. This is especially hard for young adolescent, females, and especially males, who are the group that is most susceptible to peer pressure and influence. For both men and women, susceptibility to peer pressure often decreases with age and experience. This decrease in susceptibility comes from the development of more crank and positive relationships with people who exhibit low peer pressure abilities.